I’ve been saying for several months that I would post what I’m working on, on my website, so I will try and do that here...

There are millions and millions and millions of different websites on the internet, but if you are curious about what I’m thinking, you can read this here on my website:

However, please note that I am specifically Not encouraging political development %s, because it sometimes makes governments angry.

So in my writing, I am specifically Not encouraging political development %s, so

that all people who read here are only reading non-political, core development from here.

And to please note that each person is as unique as the grains of sand on a beach, and that each culture, including cultures of 2 people or more, are not only as unique as the grains of sand on a beach, but are also constantly changing, because of the 8 billion people constantly mixing and completely new things being constantly created.

So each solution needs to be really, really, really thought about in terms of the really specific and unique local factors. There are no ‘one size fits all’…

Everything needs to be the most advanced international development each person knows about so far applied to the extremely unique local features.

Although, 80% of development needs to be from local people’s momentum and knowledge, and 20% from foreigners trying to solve what appeared to be impossible international development challenges before.

And to please note that I am specifically Not encouraging for all 8 billion to do development solutions for 8-12 hours per week (although it would make everyone a lot smarter or more advanced, increase abilities across a large variety of areas)- I’m specifically Not encouraging that because of the goal of getting more advanced with -10s to -4s. So I’m specifically Not encouraging that below.

I’m just sharing what I think are the best solutions available.

Please make sure to think about each thing carefully before.

There are several hundred millions and millions and millions of social media sites and different websites on the internet, but I have been working on international development percentages for 10+ years & these are my thoughts on the hundreds of thousands of different development goals.

I have also been accumulating information about wider international development since I first became strongly interested in wider international development 20 years ago (and the environment 25 years ago),

So if you would like to read what I am thinking, you can read this here on my website:

One Two

If you would like to help me:

Have you read through UNEP’s 6 Sector Solution and Project Drawdown’s Table of Solutions, ordered from largest in Scenario 2 (climate protection goals)?

Could you please help with %s to achieve this before 2025 (e.g. to allocate some times and then after that to not think about it until next week)?

However, only >>>where and >>>if safe from any unknown people hacking you

And ethically please

There are so many worldwide things at the same time, and so many of them are ‘impossible to solve’… this method tries to make the highly complex impossible worldwide things slowly solved… however, only >where & if safe long-term.

How do this, > if safely, safely, safely long-term and ethically, ethically, ethically?

What are 5-12 %s to really >>>safely, ethically, prevent -10s to -2s (e.g. how to
persuade sooner people to stay within ethically +5 to +10 forever, searching for climate or flood risks, solving %s) while respecting liberties, for e.g. 1-2 hrs each week (or around unique circumstances), although >only if & where safe enough long-term.

To persuading stay within +5 to +10 forever is >>>universal ethics please, plus 4 ethics packages for groups who need it…

So, persuading someone to stay within +5 to +10 forever means persuading them to stay within universal ethics +5 to +10 forever (=the best thinking on ethics around the world- so far)

plus 4 ethics packages to cover people who are not covered well enough by the above (e.g. LGBQTI people, minorities, at-risk groups, being safe enough… what other groups should be included?)

There could be four levels of ethics packages for minorities and the above- one is safety, two is basic needs, food, needs, water, clothing, the third is further needs, shelter, and the fourth would be human rights… How make the four ethics packages above both really achievable and really protective for at-risk groups?

To also >please always that people are not their govts, that people are treated as unique individuals, that you don’t know how much propaganda the other side has experienced, that people are not their govts, that people start to be treated as unique individuals. In other words, for ethics and understanding, and more so towards civilians.

So to really safely persuade sooner risky people to stay within +5 to +10 ethics forever

plus the 4 ethics packages for all -5 to +10 people,

but if you could only achieve some of it, you know what to prioritise first…

And it could be made flexible for some situations if really complicated

I hope people keep refocusing and refocusing and refocusing and refocusing and refocusing and refocusing and refocusing on good priorities and +4s to +10s

The overall idea is to encourage 5-12 %s that makes all >>>sooner people stay within ethically +5 to ethically +10 forever.

It might not be achievable, but if the safer people in the 8 billion >safely, ethically do 5-12 %s each week, to help make previously impossible things (e.g. gun crime, terrorist attacks, the 8 billion reacting to the 8 billion) more under control. However, this means that the 5-12 %s are a long-term thing, where we can make impossible things more achievable. It also solves the sense of helplessness over the past twenty years, because everyone is protecting everyone. However, to please respect adequate liberties and to please only do this if safe long-term and ethical.

The reason why sooner people is because over time, it will cover more and more of the 8 billion.

And obviously, the soonest things are the soonest.

If there is a risk of -10s to -7s, and if you are ethically +5 to +10 with this and long-term safe/careful enough, this is the only time when brainwashing is ethical. So if you need to, this is when...

If everyone focuses on persuading some or all of the soonest groups first, then the most important at-risk, to safely stay within ethically +5 to +10 forever, so, forever, need to work on this soon

The only way forward is moving towards ethical +4s to +10s, preventing -10s to -7s, then preventing -10s to -5s, then preventing -10s to -2s.

If everyone focuses on persuading first all of the sooner groups first, then the most important at-risk, to safely stay within ethically +5 to +10 forever, so, forever, need to work on this soon

I previously thought the best way was to prevent -10s to -9s, then prevent -9s to -7s, then prevent -7s to -5s, then prevent -5s to -2s.

However, the above was too hard for long-term mental health. The next solution was to be non-specific with the above, and to prevent these in non-specific ways, e.g. people don’t think about or talk about the majority of specifics, to not worry people too much, but to prevent these overall.

This is much better for mental health, but focusing on -10s to -7s first results in -7s to -2s being forgotten, and -7s to -2s affect the largest number of people.

And the idea is that a network of preventing -10s to -2s will be formed, and people’s liberties should hopefully increase

And hopefully things that were impossible, with 5-12%s each week from the safe world, were made safer…

So the next improvement was >>>safe persuasions for people sooner to stay within +5 to +10 ethics
>>> forever, which needs to be done safely enough for the long term and ethically enough

Persuading at-risk people- if really safe to- to stay within +5 to +10 ethics forever was 100x better

The next major improvement was including non-human risks, especially climate, flood, drought, physical, landslide, risks, searching for these and writing down %s of solutions as part of 5-12 %s (e.g. preparations, advocacy, writing down %s what you could do before, during, after)

So the next thing was to focus first on things with risks sooner, because these covered all -10 to -2 things. So, how do safer people in the 8 billion do 5-12 %s per week to persuade people with risks of most important -10s to -2s to stay within +5 to +10 ethical forever? Especially people with risks of sooner -10s to -2s? So the goal is to get sooner risks to solve what +5 to +10 ethics means.

However, these should only be done if and where long-term safe enough

So the next major improvement was 5-12 %s per week to persuade people with larger risks of -10s to -2s to stay within +5 to +10 ethical forever.

So if the focus is on the soonest risks, and it is shared across 5-12 %s per week of the long-term safe enough people in the 8 billion, and it is done safely, safely, safely, then persuading for +5 to +10 ethics forever would mean that an increasing percentage of the world were increasingly safer from previously impossible things, while also not restricting liberties too much.

Although, because of the 8 billion mixing, completely new things that have never existed before are frequently being created across the 8 billion mixing, most for the good, some not for the good.

But persuading for +5 to +10 ethics forever for the future is the way.

But safely, safely, safely, safely, safely persuading

And ethically please. So, focusing on the sooner priority ones

And really safely long-term persuading.

And including climate preventions please…

So the way to make this easier would be persuading for forever +5 to +10 ethics for anyone with any kinds of sooner -10 to -2 risks, including people with supply chain risks. Or alternatively, to start with specific -10s to -2s that are sooner and to work your way outwards, within mental health limits.

However, to focus on things within your mental health limits, and to write down other things for later if they are outside your mental health abilities.

And for people to start becoming aware of physical risk priorities around them (e.g. risks from climate change like sudden floods), and to start planning %s in a book if something happens. For example, you could have a writing book with potential physical risks, and to do %s around what you could do if a flood happens. Because floods don’t happen that often, you could do %s when you feel like it, and to try for %s for things at risk earlier. For example, you could do %s for safely, ethically persuading for +5s to +10s and writing down %s for what to do around flood risks in a book.

So how do you do one of the 5-12 %s… The number one most obvious way would be persuading people at risk of -10s to -2s >>>sooner to stay within +5 to +10 ethical forever.